Marc,

You probably have a point. I find it interesting that we are now defendents in these two last suits. I would imagine because the plaintiffs want the California venue. What I am having trouble with is the fact that in the in the J's case we didn't want validity determined by the court but wanted a PTO decision. If that is the case then I can see the T's wanting to rush the case to trial, but why pick California if the J's settlement was not in our favor?Why not push it thru the Rocket Docket? And if we were waiting a PTO decision why would we want to rush thru Texas and get the same results? Perplexing to me.