As I understand it, your statement seems quite obvious, and I agree with it. The T3 filed a complaint containing their assembly of the various patents, not TPL. TPL's filing in EDot against the T3 did not include the CFP, if my memory serves (I'll verify this, but if someone else has it handy, please post it - thanks in advance).
What would be interesting to me is to know what the "settlement" on the CFP consisted of.
DG