Check the case #'s, both the same:

"New Pacer--PLAINTIFFS’ DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 5:08-cv-00884-JF Document 71 Filed 12/24/2008"

Then the previous Pacer:

"I, Dan Leckrone, declare the following:
1. I am Chairman of Defendant Technology Properties Limited (“TPL”). I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth below and, if called upon to do so, could and would testify competently thereto. 2. On December 18, 2008, TPL reached a settlement with ASUSTeK Computer Inc. that disposes of all the claims in the related case Asustek Computer Inc. v. Technology Properties Limited, et al., No. 5:08-cv-00884-JF (N.D. Cal.). ASUSTeK and TPL will file a joint Notice of Dismissal with this Court shortly. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 19th day of December, 2008."
/s/ Dan Leckrone
Dan Leckrone
Chairman of Technology Properties Limited
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
In accordance with General Order 45, part X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Dan Leckrone, Chairman of Technology
Properties Limited.
Dated: December 19, 2008 /s/ Ronald F. Lopez
Ronald F. Lopez

------------------------------------...

(Must not have been enough time during the holidays to cancel the demand for jury trial pacer pacer?)