3)providing an on chip input/output interface for the microprocessor integrated circuit; and clocking the input/output interface with a second clock independent of the ring oscillator system clock

The examiner for 148 thinks the combination of Kajigaya and Tanimura contains prior art for a microprocessor clocked by a variable ring oscillator and containing internal DRAM. None of the claims in the 148 patent have any reference to (3) from above.There is no mention of (3) in either the kajigaya patent nor the Tanimura patent. Therefore every single aspect of the main '336 patent claim is not satisfied by Kajigaya/Tanimura.

http://agoracom.com/ir/patriot/forum...

Be well