Form the rejection
<The Patent Owner while arguing that the method of Pomerene is not suitable for use in a microprocessor system provides no evidence as to why it is not suitable. >
Proving that the invention is suitable for the purpose intended is not sufficient. Patent owner needs to prove that examiner combinations of prior art are not workable. A la the 148. That process can go on forever, which is why I hope Moore can somehow put a stop to it. Opty