Re: Does anyone else see this issue between Moore and TPL as a positive?srandl
posted on
Apr 05, 2009 10:31AM
That led to what was the SEAForth Project and what is the S40 chip.
Our verbal agreement was that Leckrone and I would share expenses and revenues 45/55%. Never did we agree that Leckrone would own the Project or S40. He claims he does and acts like he does: he micromanaged the project; he fired the employees; he confiscated the inventory; he disposed of lab equipment. All without consulting me, reimbursing me or obtaining my consent.
He does own some IP, a portfolio of Array Patent applications. But I own S40. I designed the chip and provided 55% of its development cost. I own the IP of the design and of the tools that created it. He can do nothing without my support, which he has thrown away.
So I will not conceal the existence of a chip of which I'm proud. I'm dismayed that this wonderful chip may not see the market. The unpackaged inventory is deteriorating while in Leckrone's possession. He fired the people who could provide technical assistance and further development. He is wasting yet another of his investments
http://www.colorforth.com/S40.htm
If TPL are involved, would you still want PTSC to invest in the S40 chip?
I wouldn't.
Be well