Sorry to disagree with you but I don't see the need for PTSC to employ Moore.
PTSC is moving away from licensing the MMP Portfolio as a source for future revenues/growth. Moore's input to the patents is as important to him as anyone, if not more so. Without validated patents there is no income stream.
It would appear that Jennifer Harris-Lohse holds the key to what did or did not transpire, ITEM 9, REEL: 014083 FRAME: 0994
http://patentabilityenterprises.com/...
http://www.colorforth.com/assignment...
One fact being overlooked in the debate to dismiss TPL/Alliacense is the current expiry of the patents.
How long and at what cost would it take to bring a new team up to date on the reverse-engineered chips alone? I don't see buying the results from TPL as a viable option as the price demanded would probably be close to the anticipated license fee revenue.
I also expressed concerns about the agreement when the P-Newco details were made available and nothing has changed since then. In my very humble opinion, TPL remains an integral part of PTSC's near-term revenues, and also over the course of the patents' validity. Mr Moore's action may have loosened the stranglehold but only time will tell.
Be well