My opinion on the obviousness factor in the rejection comes from the final rejection posting...page 6 of 36 on the IFW file...where the examiner quotes from 35 U.S.C. 103(a)....and as he states...this

"forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this office action"

Now is his interpretation of certain terms involved in this too....probably so...but his interpretation of those terms could be what allows him to use the above stated rule as his basis for an obviousness rejection...which IMO is the basis we need ot fight to get it recertified.

JMHO