biajj - correctio to your comments / Re: Steve... "RG step down ?", No, I don't
in response to
by
posted on
Jun 04, 2009 08:07AM
I agree with the substance/intent of your comments as until the pps is at least near or above what it was when RG took over, I don't think he or the BOD should continue to be rewarded for the results they have created over the last 18 months. I also think RG should stay on. Another change in CEO is the last thing we need, and while there are apparent weaknesses, or at least questionable issues with RG, he is doing what needs to be done IMO, and has put us on a path that HE needs to steer, not another new person.
That being said, based on the reviews of the SEC filings that I have read, RG's CASH-BASED-COMPENSATION is a salary of $250K, NOT $500K, and his possible bonus is not 50% of his salary, but 100% of his salary, so the bonus can be as much as $250K. That might be where you're getting the $500K amount from. My understanding is that he was to receive a $250K bonus upon being confirmed as permanent CEO after 9 months. Combine that with the $250K salary for his first year of employment, and it appears that he received $500K, but it was not all salary.
Also, according to the last conference call, executive incentive (ie bonus) compensation has been suspended, so there should be no bonuses issued. Also, the top 3 BOD members have taken a 20% reduction in their fees.
With that in mind, I don't think a $250K salary for RG is out of line, even with the pps performance. I do think the BOD should take a larger cut in pay. And I also think NO BONUSES should be issued unless and until there is significant pps appreciation, and above what the pps was at the time RG assumed control, not from these levels.