"The company does not post on this board, so you are wrong in implying that they control the perception of the company that is portrayed on this board."

What's first? The company and its communications or the reactions and interpretation of the public? Perception is a reaction not an action.

While there is no typical media publicity with PTSC (newspapers, tv et. al) the only publicity we can "use" for PTSC is the web with its messaging boards and it's no wonder PTSC had an agreement with Agoracom in 2007 to influence this web publicity.

And I'm sure most of the people here would immediately start writing positive posts if they could change the perception of PTSC and as a result increase the shareprice and their holdings, the bad thing is it wouldn't work...

I didn't especially mean you with "denigrating the whiners", it's just a phenomen on this board that every time someone says he's unhappy someone else steps in and tells him "sell or shut up" or "stop whining".

If this board could have any advantage for a new investor it should be a balanced view on the company - with all pros and cons.

GLTY