Re: (From Ron on Yahoo) Answers to your questions (long post, sorry)......
posted on
Sep 21, 2009 08:31AM
<Now the 584 may be asserted in certain cases where chips may infringe, but it certainly does not have the teeth that it was originally believed to have.>
If you are going to make a statement like that, then please explain why it is so. And please be specific. No generally speaking stuff regarding amended claims.
Opty