in tone. TPL enjoys the luxury of being a private company, therefore, it allows them to be a little reckless with their PR wording. Why didn't Patriot mention that hundreds of companies had re-engaged or that the lump payments were now to expensive for some companies? What's good for the goose is good for the gander. There should be no potential SEC conflict if the information is above board. I'll tell you why they didn't, because that kind of conjecture is useless and investors would be best served to pay it no attention. If nothing else, everyone here should know that TPL is notorious for beating their chests and swinging from vines. The truth lies somewhere in between. IMO.