To 1Rare1: The '336 was only one of two. The '148 still hanging. I wouldn't expect Ward to do anything (if there is anything to do) until BOTH patents have been resolved by the PTO (i.e., why take the time and focus only to perhaps have to do so again).

To ALL:

Some have chosen to take another look at a few of the things that MAY suggest there is more to the J3 settlement. A few of some 20+ "questionable" items I've pointed out over time (most in the Spring/Summer of '08, or was it '07?). You're only scratching the top of the iceberg - an iceberg that could be consisting of hot air instead of very cold water.

Please note what I suggested at the end of my last post. This is a futile discussion - merely a brain teaser. If the delusions come true, we IMO won't know for quite a (long) while, if ever. Remember, if there is something to it, the Js don't want the world to know. The court will have to respect this, recognizing that it would likely be in the terms of the settlement/MOU. I suspect the only real clue, and only a clue, may be an excessive amount of income in some future quarterly report - and that's it. Though I'd sure like to be vendicated for all the effort I put forth pointing out the many questionable "weirdnesses", and all the heat I took every step of the way, the reality is that such vendication will likely never come in an obvious way.

Now, beyond my saying that the discussion is futile, etc., I will again throw the words of caution I've stated in the past when people get carried away with this discussion (myself included) - we may be discussing this to our own peril. Assuming the delusions are real, there is the strong desire (obviously) by the parties (our team and the Js) to not say a word about it/reveal it. It is very likely a component of the deal, if there is one.

Our discussion of clues, etc., could undermine that desire, and conceiveable cause damage. The Js won't want to have to pay IF things happened in our favor in the delusional deal. What do you think could be their argument of last resort? Maybe that our team left so many clues laying around that certain shareholders figured it out?

The worst possible scenario would be for the delusions to be true, but the deal falls apart because the Js, in their DD to avoid having to pay, found these discussions on a shareholder message board dedicated to PTSC. For us, it would be the ultimate in shooting yourself in the foot.

Everyone, Please end the prolonged discussion. A post now and then is probably okay. Long series of posts, especially when they only really hit a couple of the many items of interest, could easily capture undesireable attention.

I do recognize that I'm part of the problem I'm concerned with and that my concern may be a further delusion. But if you're willing to buy into one, the wise should buy into the other one which could destroy the first (valuable) one.

JMHO,

SGE