Thanks for the repost. I do remember your post, especially the part about not being made public (which makes sense to me even though I would like to read it).

I am wondering about the first line which states "The Company has provided information..." I presume that the word "been" was omitted? So that it would read "The company has been provided information". If that is not the case which company is it. Did the Eclat company provide the information? Or was it the PTSC company that provided the information? If the former then it would be to PTSC? If the later than to whom did PTSC provide the information? I just cringe when those in charge can't even communicate in clear standard language. No wonder lawyers are needed.

Anyway, this line is the better part as I interpret it, "included the incorporation of their recommendation for recent management changes and the restructuring of the PDSG entity"

I read it to mean that they are incorporating the recomendations of Eclat and have acted on their recomendations for management changes ( because they state "recent") and that they did or will restucture PDSG. It could also mean that they are in the process of restructuring. We just are not going to get the details, (because we shareholders might not like them or competitors might use them against PTSC).

I have to believe that the company wrote the reply because it is so poorly written. Did this person ever attend a college? Communication is everything IMO. We communicate faster but at what cost?

I still am wondering if there was a press release about the Eclat recomendations? Did you or anyone see it and if so when? To whom was it provided? I ask because their reply to you states, "The company has provided information..." Maybe one will be coming?TIA.

And by the way, I always appreciate your efforts that go way beyond most and that you are willing to share.