Coincidently, I too scanned that litigation search info just yesterday, and saw the very same thing.

But this too must be ignored, because the company stated that there is nothing more coming from Texas, and of course they would have no reason to promote such a thought. So ignore this additional piece of "evidence", just like the customary purpose of a MOU should be ignored, and the post settlement trading prohibition should be ignored, and all the other tid-bits suggesting "something" should be ignored. Anyone putting any credence into such a find would have to be completely, certifiably delusional.

I respectfully request that "the delusional" simply place this in their mental file and not address it further, for fairly obvious reasons. Likewise those who do not suffer this malady. In the interest of your investment, please use some common sense.

TIA,

SGE