Re: TPL/ALLIACENSE/PDS - Laurie
in response to
by
posted on
Apr 28, 2010 04:52PM
We've been down this road how many times?
You suggest that TPL/Alliacense is avoiding simple accounting so they can engage in fraud.
You suggest that those other portfolio's books would indicate zero cost of sales in securing those licenses, and that nobody would notice.
You suggest that TPL and Alliacense's books would indicate zero cost of sales for those other licenses, but an exagerated cost of sales to PDS for licensing to the very same companies at the very same times, and that nobody would notice.
You suggest that those other patent portfolio owners would not recognize an issue with this, since their failure to correct the situation would make them complicit in fraud, and conspiracy.
Yup, I'm sure that everybody is just dying to go to jail for 10 years and possibly many more.
And I'm sure the IRS and other auditing agencies (PTSC's auditors, et al) are all totally blind.
And all that risk over how much money? A few thousand per instance? It's not like marketing expenses for each license would be in the hundreds of thousands.
And wouldn't each instance of intentional "incorrect accounting" constitute a separate act of fraud? (possible sentence of 10 years each).
Please....
SGE