Define USPTO resolution.

Is it a recertified '336? Is it a recertified '584? Is it a recertified '148? What's the goal line? You and others write these benchmarks as though they are absolutes. It's been the J3 settlement, the recerfications, the denial of a new re-exam, the T3 settlement, going the distance in court.

Things have gone badly. They're 10 cents away from going as bad as they possibly can. Had some level of unified shareholder action been taken a while back, do you think the company would have continued to make some of the obviously poor decisions that it's made or continued the questionable relationships that it maintains?

Milestoned likes to ask fantasmagorically tripelike questions like what would have been different in the majority voting system vs the plurality system, obviously denigrating and discouraging efforts to effect change by implying there would be no differences, and thus there is no sense in seeking change, yet what is true is that leaving things the same have changed things for the worse.

Part of that personal responsibility that you speak of is you and others leaving the company management and directors unchallenged as they fail time after time, without making any effort to effect change. So you should hold yourself and others responsible for that decision as well.