Re: @oscar: never ending seesaw of needless .. Ease ...
in response to
by
posted on
Aug 03, 2010 12:17PM
Reduce cost by removing Dr. Falk and Ms. Felcyn. Ms Felcyn or another accountant could complete work on a contract basis. In this time of unemployment, they would be lined up around the corner for this contract.
Look at how PDSG operates and decide what Schrock and Mistry, 2 well known technologists, are doing to increase SP by their connections for PDSG. If PDSG is successful then they will
This leaves Two employees, Flowers, plus a secretay and One BOD member, Johnson. This is lean to me. This will knock the salary way down.
Why should we need more for 2 products that may turn to one product? We don't need to add, we need to subtract.
Note. If PDSG is successful, this will change the game and an employee or 2 MAY need to be added to PDSG to increase value to their product.
Ease, I realize you want to reduce costs and I agree. I think my reduction effort is much better than taking on more risk with more people. Focus of PTSC must be on evaluating the actions of TPL and Alliasense and monitoring and leading PDSG as well as investments. There is still a long time for shareholders and myself before we vote but right now my intent is to vote against rather than vote for.