< On April 22, 2010 it filed an action in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara, against TPL and Alliacense which was placed under seal provisionally by the court at the defendants' request. On August 12, 2010, the Court considered defendants' request to seal the file indefinitely and to compel private arbitration of the dispute and denied both Motions. On August 13, 2010 the Court provisionally allowed some file redactions pursuant to a Motion filed by TPL and will decide the appropriateness of those redactions on September 30, 2010>

The question I have pertains to the appropriateness of redactions. For a company licensing IP it might be appropriate, but for an individual being sued for fraud, perhaps the same statements are viewed in a different light? So even if Lecky is let off the hook with PTSC tomorrow, he still has to worry?

Opty