I am replying to an email i just received about fish and moore with a question about my history. yes fish did some of the patents on his own which ones i forget. I think they did some together and at the end moore added something what i forget. I realize this but in this situation who did what. this is why i believe they are co authors. can you separate their respectiv accomplishments. yes you have a valid point i do not think moores name

should have been on all but what is at the patent office defines it all and i think that is what happened corrections welcome