Does anyone really believe that there was ever a serious effort to bring infringers to the table?If you do,you were duped, and continue to be duped. This was all meant to appear as an effort, but in reality it is nothing more than stall tactics. $260 mil is peanuts. The fox, or foxes are in the hen house. What public company would sign such a restrictive MA and not expect major problems? Considering the reputation of one of the parties should any other outcome have been expected? Unfortunately, this situation begs SEC intervention. A lot of money and power behind the scenes influencing strategic people.