Re: CM Blog update: Facts. Mr. Baily
in response to
by
posted on
Oct 21, 2010 09:14PM
I am writing in reply to a potentially harmful speculation about our company.
CenturyCom wrote:
>> "GreenArrays is starting production of its 144-computer chip with an accompanying evaluation board. Details at greenarrays.com. This is the result of funding, testing and refinement." Wonder where he got the funding?
Since when is a question harmful? I'll answer my own question : usually when it is not answered. Thank you for responding.
And by the way, please take note of your statement today:
"As to whether it is worth more than a few pennies to Chuck, of course it is ... you folks divide your half four hundred million ways, while Chuck was expecting to receive 55% of the other half. What's 25 cents per share for you ought to be 55 million dollars for Chuck, the man who earned that share by creating the patented technology from which all that comes. Again just about the numbers.
I imagine the above could be construed harmful, even more easily than my statement, because isn't the Fish clock named after Russell Fish for some reason? Seems that Mr. Fish does not get the credit he deserves also, or am I wrong?
I am not by any means trying to make sour grapes. i would just like to know why my investment went south. Great technology, but way too much drama. The main reason we sit at such a dismal S/P