It's funny that the stock has traded between 8 and 10 cents for the two months prior to the PACER filing date of 2/4. On that date, the price "spiked" (LOL) to 11 cents on 2.3M shares of trading. Subsequently, it traded between 9 and 11 cents for the next 3 weeks including the day that the PACER was posted by Wolf. Only after the hearing a day later, did the price rise to 15 cents, and as usual, it has settled back down a bit, though thankfully has maintained above 10 cents...so far. You imply that Wolf and his "family" somehow were the only ones capable of taking advantate of these price swings, yet for 3 weeks as you point out, there was ample opportunity to purchase shares a 9 cents.

Lambert doesn't this strengthen SGE1 argument. You forgot to mention the three weeks of FUD that followed and was allowed to remain. Also that it was posted an hour before the close on the day before the hearing.Coupled with an altered pacer date?Seems that some here have double standards.