Not surprising. I got the same response from Ron a couple of years ago when I gave him the chance to embarrass me by posting all the great accomplishments of biajj related to PTSC. He avoided it also. Do you guys just like me so much that you don't want to embarras me? Or is it that I called your bluff. Again, I'll let the readers decide.

I have no rage or need to deride. I do have derision for people that post what I consider misleading info, as you have. But no rage. No hysteria. Just a need to keep the info somewhat accurate.

As for your other points, PTSC got 30% for the last 3 years. So what does that mean? The most TPL could have possibly gotten is 70% and that's if there's absolutely no expenses to people outside of TPL, which we know is not a good assumption. Still not anywhere near your 95%. As for dealing with facts, I deal with ALL RELEVANT facts. I don't cherry pick them to try to mislead.

"Neither does the fact that part of what is classified as "third party expenses" in PDS's financials, is the money TPL gets for their patent lobbying efforts, not just MMP legal fees. Again, you're too interested in trying to ridicule to do the homework to realize it."

Not even sure what you're trying to say here. Again, not trying to ridicule, just trying to deal with accurate info. What is the point you are trying to make in the above paragraph?

I know what my focus is and it certainly isn't to embarrass or ridicule. So why don't you stop the accusations and simply deal with all the facts that tell an accurate story. Not just the story you want to tell.

In fact, I've given you the chance and practically begged you to embarrass me. The fact that you haven't doesn't mean that you've taken the higher ground. It just means that you can't.