According to Moore's complaint:

119. Plaintiff Moore does not know the exact amount of the royalties to which he is entitled and an accounting is necessary to determine the amount of the royalties due to him, in that Plaintiff Moore remains ignorant of the licenses issued on his MMP Portfolio, the gross revenues received, the amounts paid to PTSC, the amounts received by TPL and Alliacense and the legitimate expenses that TL and Alliacense may be entitled to deduct in determining the ComAg royalties due to Plaintiff Moore.

http://colorforth.com/MoorevsTPL.pdf (p. 26)

Now compare this to the information provided by Moore in his blog dated June 23. I have underlined preserve the infringer pool for a reason. If Moore is referring to past licensing when he speaks of the $50M, then those licensees would no longer be part of the infringer pool. It is my belief that based on his complaint where he states that he doesn’t know what he is already owed, he is referring to future licensing when he speaks of the $50M. Corrections, comments welcome.

It's to my advantage that they preserve the infringer pool until I restore my royalty. I have plans for that $50M.

If he is speaking of money he anticipates collecting from the current infringer pool, what remaining value can be attributed to the MMP portfolio as of today?