Re: SGE1 - Toxic- SGE
in response to
by
posted on
Jul 18, 2011 04:41PM
SGE, ya know I respect you as a long time poster, however, I have to call it as I see it.
When has this company not been involved in some sort of litigation or agreement that required silence and yet…
Pohl, Turley and Goerner did communicate with shareholders. What changed?
Regarding material events and the requirement for an 8K, I might remind you that one of our posters did visit the corporate office the day before the ASHM only to find the movers were there. Where was the immediate 8K or disclosure to shareholders advising us of a change of address? Or is this not a material event?
The unofficial communication that certain shareholders received, logically suggests only one thing and that is the author chose to remain anonymous and lacked the writing skills I would expect from Cliff, Gloria or Carl. So who wrote it and why did the previously mentioned three allow it to be sent at all?
If you have the ear of the BoD then perhaps you alone may be the single shareholder who might convince them to convince the Judge that transparency (re: licensing) is of extreme importance to shareholders.
Regarding PDSG, if it were such a great acquisition don’t you agree the world would have known about it by now? Even Baroni is gone and he was the one who was supposed to find the “channel partners” whatever the heck they are and a new CEO. Cliff has been interim long enough don’t ya think? Either give him the job or give us the reasons why not.
Laurie