I suspect that the "obvious" you intend to address is that what is being discussed is a mechanism enabling action by disgruntled shareholders.

The unfortunate thing is that it is, IMO, probably the most destructive mechanism available. It's one of those "looks good on paper" things, where its practical application ultimately results in what I described in my prior post. Shareholders lose. Could PTSC (and the PPS) recover? Maybe, someday.

Would the action really force change? Please advise of when/why/how. The only change I see it forcing would be on the PPS, in the wrong direction.

And change NOW (or in the near future)?

Please advise of what actions currently being taken or planned (per public disclosure) are at issue. After all, it's real obvious to me that PTSC's terms for settlement with TPL would, by business necessity (not to mention shareholder demands), be intended to correct all the deficiencies of prior agreements. And they are not "giving in". And it appears that their stated intent, with resumption of licensing revenues, is to do exactly what the majority of shareholders want.

It seems they are on precisely the right path (finally), and you want to TRY to kick them off the road while inflicting more suffering on shareholders in the process.

FWIW,

SGE