<No, you're not having any trouble with what I'm saying.>

OK then, let's look at what you said.

<but hypothetically assuming such, there is then likewise no reason to continue to make any other comments of any kind about PTSC, no matter how "positive" they may be, on more than one single occasion. Is that what you wish to occur?>

The opposite of any positive matter, is any negative matter.I never suggested that we not discuss any negative matter, only litigation against the company, unless there are some NEW grounds brought to our attention.Why do you construe something very specific to mean anything?

<If so, I assume we will now see you begin to remove each and every post that is repetitive in any way whatsoever, even if it is "positive" in nature. Good luck on that.>

It is my belief that the membership of the Agora PTSC board decides what is appropriate and what isn’t. And that is what I am talking about. Repeat as often as the board allows it. It isn’t a quid pro quo situation.But I admit, my understanding of who controls the PTSC board content here on Agora may be incorrect.

Opty