I've said it before " They have built an unpenetrable wall around themselves." All the nonbinding proposals shareholders make IMO are a waste of time. They clearly state in the shareholder material that they have no intention of upholding Brian's mandatory share purchase requirement for board members if it passes.

I suggest everyone take the time to read the shareholder material they provided. Take a look too at Cliff's employment contract. I certainly hope licensing resumes or I can't think of very many reasons to keep holding shares.

Here is what they say about the last shareholder proposal,

"The principal factors upon which the Board made its decision include the fact that a substantial majority of public companies still use the plurality standard due to the increased likelihood of a failed election or the potential that stockholders would not elect a director that is needed to satisfy a regulatory or experience requirement. We expect the topic of stockholder proposals to be addressed during the upcoming stockholder meeting."