You said "Ideally, Leckrone should be prevented from meeting any potential licensee without a PTSC representation"

I agree 100%. Does PTSC now get to review every license agreement as part of the settlement agreement with TPL? Or, does Carl wait to hear from Dan regarding how much money (or in this case, how little money) will be going to PDS and trickle down to PTSC?

If TPL is continuing to commingle license agreements and is offering some kind of patent peace...meaning he is just throwing in the MMP to sweeten the deal when the real revenue to him is for his other portfolios, how is PTSC able to prevent this? Seems to me our BoD needs to be seriously questioned about possible patent peace arrangements by Leckrone?