Correct me if I am wrong, but I remember reading that Barco claims that the chips we have specified as infringing were not the chips used in the products that we claim infringe. Therefore a summary judgement could be issued on those products since they dont have the chips we have reversed engineered and subsequent claim of infringement. If so the summary judgement would not be a fatal blow to the MMP just the infringemnt case against Barco. Lets hope we identified the proper chips with the proper product. I am feeling good about the Markman outcome. Maybe naively so but the PTO said they were valid and PUBPAT did its best to try and invalidate us and we made it through the gauntlet coupled with our other "successful" Markman now lets show the world that companies do infringe.

GL