Ron, It is my recollection that the IC’s in question here are the amended or add infringement contentions TPL wanted to add to the original IC’s they had previously submitted to the court. In other words, I believe it was because of a recent Patent Office re-exam that went our way, TPLwe wanted to add additional products to our original list of infringing products.

If I’m remembering this correctly, then only some of the recently added IC’s would not be allowed. Barco would still be on the hook for the original list of infringing products we submitted. The whole case against them wouldn’t be dismissed would it?

These two sentences from the beginning of Master Denver’s order indicate such to me. Am I wrong?

The motion by plaintiff, Barco, to strike portions of TPL’s infringement contentions

came on for hearing on February 24, 2012.

In its amended infringement contentions, served on October 11, 2011, defendant,

TPL, has failed to meet the directive in Judge Lloyd’s Order, supra.

(Underline by me.)