Very helpful and goes to show how there is absolutely no reason to update the claims and have another Markman. The chips are all subject to the MMP claims because of the ubiquitous nature of the MMP technology. Pure FUD by dbcooper and his mike friends. Trying to scare away prospective investors and those who may have taken a position in the low teens. Claiming delay and how anything related to ICs and patent local rules will lose the case. This post should crystalize this entire IC issue as the 10** chip sets are so similar that the clocking, instruction register and DMAs are essentially identical. The PLRs require the specific be referenced in the ICs and not the 'parent' chip. QED