Cliff ? Gloria ? Carl ? Swartz ? Who ???

The Aug 22nd timing was more than coincidential; and so will the likely fallout be too.

YOU said "contracted for". A contract is NOT a "contract" unless in contains some form of "consideration". Now you back-peddle and suggest there was no "consideration". So who is confused?

You say that the critical issue is the TIMING. Since there was no possibility of the BoD trading stock within ten days of the 10-K being released, even if the trade was announced, I have to assume you suggest that the timing was intended to offset the anticipated not-so-hot 10-K. If this were the case, IMO the timing was terrible. The far better approach would have been to "time" the tout sheet for the day after the 10-K release; if they were involved as you suggest and wanted to effectively offset the 10-K. Before don't work so good - immediately after might. If that tout sheet had been released this morning instead of over a week ago, do you think the PPS would have closed higher or lower?

I stand corrected on the volume/PPS spike, as it appears you are correct that it most likely was a result of promulgation of the tout sheet.

Please advise as to when my opinions are so off the mark, and not as worthy as other opinions shared on this forum. I suspect you are referring to the J3 MOU. You know, the opinion that it was POSSIBLE that the contingency addressed by the MOU had to do with re-exams, and the opinion that was consistently referred to as the "Delusional PTO Contingency Theory". "Delusional", as in I may be seeing something that isn't there. I never stated as fact that this was the reason for the MOU, only that it was POSSIBLE. And it was possible (and logical), it just turned out not to be the case.

And please explain to all shareholders how the content of the tout sheet is not worthy of discussion on a PTSC message board. Do you believe that content, which is the likely reason for all shareholders being invested in PTSC, is not worthy because it is, as you say, "old news"? Apparently so, per your words.

I find this laughable when, over the last several years, you and your cohorts have constantly directed attention to truly old news - typically years-old news. Ah, but your "old news" is all negative, and the "old news" of the tout sheet is all positive. Hmmm....

Back to lurk mode.... As always, when I post I am subjected to personal attacks, but per certain Hub Leaders, THOSE posts are worthy. Fair and balanced! LOL

SGE