I see that discussing a 10-K that was released just over a week ago is now considered "rehashing the past".

I see that analyzing the relative distributions of the MMP revenues as revealed in the same 10-K is considered "rehashing the past".

As I've posted before, things are the same, until they're different. It is COMPLETELY within Cliff Flowers' power to change the salary and bonus situation of the CEO of the company. It is COMPLETELY withing Clff Flowers' power to change his level of investment in the company. It is COMPLETELY in Gloria Felcyn and Carlton Johnson to do the same on both fronts. It's certainly COMPLETELY within my power to stop bring up the new information that supports unchanged positions, but I'd rather illuminate it than cover it up. Perhaps posters who desire a different discussion should contact these people and ask them to try something DIFFERENT rather than complaining that I keep posting about them.