In a nutshell as that is all I have time for right now as I am keeping a Dr. waiting but......

A week ago I wrote a post on PR's the two types and why we need both types and we need them frequesntly so Alton might I suggest you and others who might agree with you reread that post as well as study in depth Ron and Lamb's post regarding PR's (of whatever definition.

To suggest that we do not need them unless we have outstanding breaking news is a main reason we have a stock priced at .12 and I did not say worth .12 I purposed said priced at. If anybody would like to pm me regarding more clarification please do so.

Second brief bit of info regarding the benefit of PR's on the MH and the Reexams and everything else in between. Last night I had a discussion with an attorneywho works for the law firm that is involved in the Apple and Samsung case. In other words he is an IP (property rights). I did not get into much detail regarding Patriot (though I told him the name), I did bring up a few items to see his reaction to some facts regarding PTSC. I mentioned how many times we had been in front of the PO and how many reexams we had won and then I mentioned the two MH's in two diffierent court jurisdictions. He was quite impressed, however when I told him where our share price sat and how many shares we had and after he asked a few more questions he indicated that there were solutions to our problems which would only take our "mgmt" and "Board of Directors" to act in a certain way. I spent less then five minutes going into that sticky wicket (?) after which he literally shook his head and suggested we take the matter up at another time when we both had more time though he did say that unless we had people who were willing to act correctly there was little else to say regarding why we were where we are.

Not much there we did not know but I thought I would share anyway.

God Bless you all

marc