Here's a situation where a respondent had their MSD struck down by Gildea. All cases are different, but the reasoning may be relevant.
ALJ Gildea Denied Cablevision's Motion for Summary Determination of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,367,078 and 7,561,214
ALJ Gildea denied a motion filed by respondent Cablevisioin Systems Corp. ("Cablevision") for summary determination that no accused product infringes U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,367,078 and 7,561,214 in In the Matter of Certain Digital Set-Top Boxes and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-712. In his order Gildea found that summary determination is not appropriate. The parties dispute the correct interpretation of the claims and "without an agreed construction for the claim terms, [Movant] has not demonstrated that it is 'entitled to a summary determination as a matter of law.'"
Taken from http://www.itc337update.com/tags/summary-judgment/