Mosaic ImmunoEngineering is a nanotechnology-based immunotherapy company developing therapeutics and vaccines to positively impact the lives of patients and their families.

Free
Message: Re: Trial- Toxic
11
Jun 18, 2013 12:41PM
4
Jun 18, 2013 01:06PM

Jun 18, 2013 01:12PM
2
Jun 18, 2013 04:16PM
Domestic Industry
Requirements
&
Non
-
Practicing
Entities
An essential element of a
Section 337 violation is the domestic industry requirement. The
complainant must show that ithas made sufficient investments in the United States
withrespect to articles protected by the
IP right concerned
.
The statute was amended in 1988 to
allow IP rights holdersthat do not manufacture products
(i.e.,non-practicing entitiesor NPEs)to obtain remedies at theUS
ITC. Congress made note in amending the statute that
inventors,universities,start-ups,and other entities that conduct
research and development, engineering,or licensing activities
are equally entitled to Section 337 relief as are manufacturing industries.
An issue receiving some attention is whether certain NPEs should be permitted to
  1. obtain relief against infringing imports at the USITC.No commonly understood definitionof an NPE exists.
For analytical purposes,
the Commission used the following categories:
Category 2 NPEs. Entities that do not manufacture products that practice the asserted patentsand whose business model primarily focuses on purchasing and asserting patents.
Category 1 NPEs.All other entities that do not manufacture products
that practice the asserted patents, including
inventors who may have done R&D or built prototypes
but do not make a product covered by the asserted patents and therefore rely on licensing to meet the domestic industry requirement; research institutions, such as universitiesand laboratories, that do not make products covered by the patents, and therefore relyon licensing to meet the domestic industry requirement;start-ups
that possess IP rights but do not yet manufacture products
that practice the patent; and manufacturers whose products do not practice the asserted patents
.
Some commentators have suggested that NPE filings, particularly by Category 2 NPEs,accountfor the increased caseload at the USITC because ofthe U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, LLC
, which made injunctions more difficult to obtain in district courts
.
However, those commentators have not offered a convincing analysis of the data on investigation institutions to support this suggestion
.
1
Jun 18, 2013 05:05PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply