I do not know how many on this board read my lengthy and somewhat incoherent post of August 31st around 1300 hours? However, If you did and if you could understand what I was attempting to say in my rambling way ..... please allow me to add one more comment.

When Leckrones expert assigns a rather low tier rating to our case IMO, (though I think that Ease showed that the "experts" opinion would not necessarily hold water if we win, though that is a different subject matter) there is something that I do not remember reading in any recent post though it is possible I missed such a post or it was talked about years ago and that subject matter is.......

If our two Judge's, at the ITC and the NCOC, (both fortuitously IMO having their last name starting with the great letter G) find in our favor and if we are allowed to go to trial without Leckrone stopping that action by insisting on a settlement and if all goes our way in both instances then I have a question?????

Why in this type of situation, (no matter what is decided at the ITC and NDOC), Corporations some small but many multi national Giants have used our patents to enrich and grow their companies in a tech area that if they did not use our patents they would have been left behind in the dust.... why is this not a major issue in all the cases.

The main question I am attempting to present but doing a poor job of doing so..... is that without the MMP patents where would the state of the art be in the world of electronics? If all companies followed the law the way they should have from day one then the Samsongs, Apples, IBM's etc etc etc would never have been able to develop the products that they have by using the patents developed by Fish, Moore and yes Brown. What if they had to been able to find a way around those patents but had come up with one ears later that may not have been nearly as good as the MMP IS!!!!

Would there be Ipods, Ipads, smart phones, and yes thousands of more examples most of which I can not even name but would leave it up to those on this board that are much more technically oriented then I.

I believe that in a trial that we should win where it is pointed out what Fish and Moore have done to advance mankind with their patents.....damages should be awarded for many reasons but the largest of which would be how many billions were made by infringing corporations in products and product lines that would not have existed if the corporations did not have the aforementioned innovations allowed by the patents we have owned for decades now thanks to the genius of the Fishes and Moores or the land.

I hope I have made position clear in this post. If not I apologize to you for taking up your time. I know what I meant to say I am just not sure I was able to get my thoughts across herein.

Hope you all have been having a great and safe Labor Day weekend.

God Bless

Marc

P.s. Make sure you read Ron's recent post because as usual he lays out his thoughts in a coherent way that I wish I could do and also read Ease's recent post who basically in one paragraph laid out a lot of what I attempted to do on the 31st in a long winded ramble.