I have addressed your points as I see them....

You post

"i much prefer a business decision: (as compared to a trial)"

I say that would be true if the parties in that" business decision", were honorable, individuals or were companies run by people with integrity. We would not need to go to court or even threaten to go to court if that was the universal case with the businesses we are dealing with. I believe the business that we have already licensed and those who still have not done so know they have stolen the intellectual property of someone else and are betting they can get away with it. (So far even the ones who have paid nuisance fees for a license have shown they can get away with stealing and that is not a business decision I have ever condoned. Of course that is my opinion.

You post:

"1. most people on here on not businessmen, and they have no clue about making a "business" decision."

I personally have no idea whether most people who have invested in PTSC are or have been businessmen or businesswomen. My comments were directed more to those shareholders who invested in PTSC over the long haul and have seen the poor business decisions that have brought the company to this point in time and to this share price. You do not have to be a bman or bwomen to know that the leaders of a business know what they are doing or are totally unfit to run said business. And before you or someone else says that I and others do not have to be invested in this stock, you are right. I personally have sold shares at various times in addition to everything else I still believe in the DD that I and other "old timers" have done on the patents that ptsc holds that it is about time to take the decision making out of the hands of the folks who have run this company for their own pleasure and profit and I would like to see what an independent party (ITC and NDOC) has to say about the validity of our situation. I believe that if like the 17 reexams they agree with the strength of the patents we can seek substantially more then Leckrone seeks in his quest for his "settlements". Of course imo

You post:

Because as I have pointed out the "choice" you refer to is to follow the methodology that to date has made the Leckrones and our Board members rich and has done nothing to enhance the shareprice except for a few times the last being in 2006 or for those who day trade for pennies. We do not have control over our company as Brian has pointed out by posting how our desire for a sea change in the Board has been ignore so the time now IMO is to give control to an outside source. Judges and people who hopefully have honesty an integrity as their sole motivation.

"3. i do not care about "holding their feet to the fire". i do not care about "vengeance". i do not care about "making them pay" as if it were the individual making the payments."

You make it sound as if I am on a personal vendetta. I apologize if I have given you that impression. I just believe in running a business, (and I have) by treating all with respect. By being honest, moral and doing business with the highest integrity as possible. I believe that if a company has stolen from another company that company should be penalized as if it had been a person stealing from another person. We through our "broker", Mr. Leckrone, have given all of these companies a chance to come clean on the cheap. Yet most have ignored that method and have continued to use our technology to the benefit of their shareholders to the tune of millions if not billions of dollars by using our patents for free. Like a thief who is caught and brought before the halls of justice there is a piper to be paid and since we cannot put a company in jail we certainly can make them pay in large not nuisance dollars.. Once again IMO

You post:

"4. all i want is a reasonable, appropriate, vetted fee for the use of the patented items, whether the fee be a one-time amount or a series of payments."

For the most part I do not disagree with you other then the word reasonable should be what a reasonable company would expect. Not what Leckrone and our Board wants to satisfy their own desires. If you have been a shareholder for a long time then you know how many thousands of post have been directed to us receiving royalty payments which to date has never been proven as this is also a method I do not believe that leckrone believes in. In addition there should be damages for the cost we have incurred to obtain a license fee .... for legal and administrative cost that at this point amount to the tens of millions in addition to what Agility will be receiving.

Once again my answers above are my opinion

marc