Mosaic ImmunoEngineering is a nanotechnology-based immunotherapy company developing therapeutics and vaccines to positively impact the lives of patients and their families.

Free
Message: Re: Another Step Ahead....
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Another Step Ahead....
7
MagBeach
Oct 24, 2013 03:42PM

Thanks for the link!

After reading it I have a question. Do you or anyone else recall what PTSC traded for Talis? Somebody got our 39.4% interest, but what did we get? TIA

"The company has traded its 39.4% interest in Talis Data Systems and also sold Vigilys technology in 2010."

1 Recommendations
Re: Another Step Ahead....
1
Alton
Oct 24, 2013 04:29PM
Re: Another Step Ahead.. Thanks, but this is exactly what we DON'T want
7
Biajj2too
Oct 24, 2013 04:39PM
Re: Another Step Ahead.. Thanks, but this is exactly what we DON'T want
6
leopard
Oct 24, 2013 05:29PM
Re: Another Step Ahead.. Thanks, but this is exactly what we DON'T want

toxic waste
Oct 24, 2013 07:52PM
Re: Another Step Ahead.. Thanks, but this is exactly what we DON'T want -Biajj2t
17
Alton
Oct 25, 2013 01:38AM
Re: Another Step Ahead.. Thanks, but this is exactly what we DON'T want -Biajj2t
10
head2toe
Oct 25, 2013 07:12AM
Re: Another Step Ahead.. Thanks, but this is exactly what we DON'T want - Bjajj2
4
MagBeach
Oct 25, 2013 09:03AM
Icon president Re: Another Step Ahead.. Thanks, but this is exactly what we DON'T want - Mag

BaNosser
Oct 25, 2013 10:16AM
Re: Another Step Ahead.. Thanks, but this is exactly what we DON'T want - Mag
2
MagBeach
Oct 25, 2013 10:25AM
Re: .. Young alton, it just wouldn't be fair; you're obviously unarmed.
3
Biajj2too
Oct 25, 2013 11:09AM
Re: Step Ahead.. Mag, I said "thanks", what more would you have liked ? eom
1
Biajj2too
Oct 25, 2013 11:12AM
Re: This kind of press is exactly what we DON'T want. As you may recall
12
Biajj2too
Oct 25, 2013 11:48AM
Re: This kind of press is exactly what we DON'T want.....Biajj
3
Alfred_E
Oct 25, 2013 11:57AM
Polomar, so why were post positive for 3 days, then (high volume) negative since
3
Mike4321
Oct 26, 2013 07:46AM
Icon president Re: posts positive for 3 days, then (high volume) negative since...Mike and all
17
ronran
Oct 26, 2013 09:33AM
Icon president palomar.....
7
ronran
Oct 26, 2013 09:39AM
Re: posts positive for 3 days, then (high volume) negative since...Mike and all
5
Marillion
Oct 26, 2013 10:25AM
Re: posts positive for 3 days, then (high volume) ...for Pete's sake!
2
Alfred_E
Oct 26, 2013 10:31AM
Re: posts positive for 3 days, then (high volume) ...for Pete's sake!
1
Marillion
Oct 26, 2013 10:34AM
Re: FWIW, that trash is pure fantasy and a complete lie. eom
8
Biajj2too
Oct 26, 2013 12:08PM
Re: posts positive for 3 days, then (high volume) negative since...Mike and all
4
bankerson
Oct 26, 2013 12:13PM
Re: posts positive for 3 days, then (high volume) negative since.. Ron
2
Mike4321
Oct 26, 2013 12:52PM
Re: This kind of press is exactly what we DON'T want. As you may recall
11
ptsc3p0
Oct 26, 2013 01:39PM
Icon president Re: posts positive for 3 days, then (high volume) negative since..
14
BaNosser
Oct 26, 2013 02:21PM
Re: palomar.....
2
palomar
Oct 26, 2013 08:52PM
Re: This kind of press is exactly what we DON'T want. As you may recall
6
Spotter57
Oct 26, 2013 10:48PM
Re: posts positive for 3 days, then (high volume) negative since.. BaNosser
5
Mike4321
Oct 27, 2013 08:45AM
Re: posts positive for 3 days, then (high volume) negative since.. BaNosser

runner28
Oct 27, 2013 10:17AM
Re: posts positive for 3 days, then (high volume) negative since.. BaNosser

runner28
Oct 27, 2013 10:21AM
Icon president Re: posts positive for 3 days, then (high volume) negative since.. BaNosser/Mike
16
BaNosser
Oct 27, 2013 03:25PM
Re: posts positive for 3 days, then (high volume) negative since.. BaNosser/Mike
3
eagle3
Oct 27, 2013 03:53PM
Re: posts positive for 3 days, then (high volume) negative since.. BaNosser/Mike

Marillion
Oct 27, 2013 04:21PM
Re: posts positive for 3 days, then (high volume) negative since.. BaNosser/Mike
1
surginurse
Oct 27, 2013 05:11PM
Icon president Re: posts positive for 3 days, then (high volume) negative since.. BaNosser/Mike
3
BaNosser
Oct 27, 2013 07:16PM
Re: What do you think BaNoss?
3
ease2002f
Oct 27, 2013 08:02PM
Re: posts positive for 3 days, then (high volume) negative since.. BaNosser/Mike
1
surginurse
Oct 27, 2013 08:58PM
Re: posts positive for 3 days, then (high volume) negative since...chuckle
15
FutTheWuk
Oct 28, 2013 11:07AM
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply