And why do you suppose Johnson and Felcyn agreed to allow that situation, and infact, even agreed to raise the "skim" (to use your word) from 15 - 20% ?

Even worse, it appears they did so while at the same time dropping the negotiating leverage we enjoyed which was brought about by our numerous Complaints (including Fraud, Unjust enrichment, Breach, etc) we filed in Superior Court against TPL.

PTSC is in a unique position to disclose how the direct Alliasence relationship and contract terms with PDS were negotiated. I think it's curious why we haven't yet really seen any justifications (aside from the usual, "in Shareholder's best interests") or proportional aggressiveness in BK court filings out of PTSC in the matter.

* If I've missed PTSC's specific and detailed remarks on this issue, someone please post it.