be seen as such a significant dereliction of the most central or perhaps most critical aspect of the PTSC Representative ... to insure fair decision making and a smoothly functioning PDS Board, especially when full licensing authority was contractually placed in the hands of the other Partner, that aside from any/all fallout and damage to PTSC that occurred from such failure and would likely have been avoided with a properly constituted Board, which they apparently now finally admit, I imagine that there would be good legal cause for Carl to disgorge some portion of his $3,000 monthly fee the BOD paid him to see to it that the Agreement terms were upheld in fulfilling that representative role.

I think Neilson left sometime in 2009, so that could add up to approx 60 months of payment, or up to as much as $180,000 that Carl would need to pull out from his pocket and repay the company.