causing TPL to be in breach of the agreeements pursuant to which it is entitled to commercialize those patents and would likely cause the termination of those agreements

Not dealing with the idea that "the patents would expire" ??? ( is that just a scare tactic, an absolute or just a maybe... we know how DL can manipulate words..! ) ......do you or anyone else think that it will be best to not approve cash collateral and let TPL's agreements terminate? Would one of those agreements be with Patriot? With CM? If the agreement with TPL expires would Patriot then be subjected to forming a new agreement with CM?

Or is TPL just talking about other patents and agreements? You would think the court/credit committee would ask and require specifics! Maybe they already know? If they are not in the court documents how are we supposed to know?

Since when did not paying insurance cause a patent to expire?? Never heard of that one! IMO and as I see it, this guy is a word-smith for sure, spining a web of mistruths and fear. I can only hope he gets caught in his own diabolical web machine!