http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?u=%2Fnetahtml%2Fsrchnum.htm&Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&r=1&l=50&f=G&d=PALL&s1=5809336.PN.&OS=PN/5809336&RS=PN/5809336

It seems to me that,Judge Grewel considered the merits/or lack thereof, of the infringer's arguments,together with the wording of the Patent, as ISSUED by the Patent Office, to arrive at his recommendation..

He considered the extraneous/erroneous verbiage produced by the infringer's Advocates,and concluded that, there was NO merit there.... IMO...

A motion for a summary Judgement by our side should be made,as soon as it is appropiate.

IMO..

PS; Nice job of cutting through the pile of BS by Paul Grewel..IMO