I'm not sure you and I looked at the same claim construction report. Pages 10 and 11 are pretty clear in raising the estoppel arguments that were created in the file wrapper by the patentees. It's not just the claims but also the file wrapper and estoppel created by patentees arguments that are used in claim construction.

The above being said, there is still the argument that the ring oscillator doesn't need any control signals to oscillate and carry out its functions. I don't think that argument goes away, but I feel a negative vibe in all of this because of the way the Judge talks about Magar and Sheets' teachings. I guess we'll see.