But I think they did. This is exactly what we wanted. Anything but agreement to Grewal was a positive. My frustration comes from the appeals court "editorializing" the ruling by saying they are not sure if it helps this case becuase of the stipulation. Why did they say that. And playing devils advocate, maybe be put that stipulation in there to make tha appeals court change the CC while making them feel that their decision won't have an impact. Reverse physcology, but a little bit of a conspiracy theory...