RING of Fire, not "Boomerang"

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

imaviking

Rank: Treasurer [?]

Points: 686 [?]

Votes: 60 Score: 3.8 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

RING of Fire, not "Boomerang"

posted on Sep 28, 2007 05:07AM

All of the maps that I have seen posted here, show a boomerang shaped formation, along which most of the claims so far are positioned.

Why do you suppose they are using the term "Ring" ? My guess is that we are only looking at less than half of the prospective ground with these maps. The new staking may be taking place MANY miles away.

Thoughts?

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Please to post a reply