OT: Textbook Action... MiningJunkie
posted on
Oct 05, 2007 03:04PM
NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)
MJ,
Your comments:
"Those individuals are now "noted" by me as the "Noront Religious Right" and Canseco is now the Joe McCarthy of the Citizens for a Bash-Free Society movement. His allegations earlier are analagous to the statements made by Senator Joe MCarthy in the 1950's "I have here in my posession documents which undeniably PROVE that MJ is a card-carrying Communist (read "Basher") and request that this forum tar and feather him from the highest yardarm". What a total load of mindless garbage."
are, quite frankly, surprising. I imagined you to be above such things, and if you were who you purport, or pretend, to be, you would have ignored the comments that Canseco and others, including me, made about our suspicions of you.
However, by responding in the way that you have, by being overly defensive, you further discredit yourself and reveal that we have struck a chord - lending further to our suspicions that you are not what you appear to be. Cracks in the foundation are beginning to appear, and my once esteemed impression of you is rapidly crumbling.
If you had been around long enough, you would know that Canseco's comments had nothing to do with an intolerance of anything resembling negative comments about NOT, but rather about suspicions of you. I have made many posts in the past expressing views about Windfall Lake that were less optimistic than those of people such as Canseco and others, even once playing Devils' advocate and challening the board to look for weaknesses in the company and its projects that we were overlooking, and yet I was never considered suspicious, or suspected of ulterior motives
You have either ignored or misunderstood the fact that its not specifically your comments about NOT that are at issue, but rather inconsistencies in the things you have posted that call into question your credibility...
And your recent post, in my view, only further erodes that credibility, as someone of your apparent intelligence would have known better, and would not have lowered themselves to such tactics. Rather, you now appear to be one of those sorts of people who tries to dazzle people into not noticing what you are really are or are about... But's that just my "rightful" opinion.
Regards,
B.