Just got off the phone with David.

Stated that it was a mistake and he apologized, that it was him looking at the wrong line as Nemis shows just above Novak and got the names mixed up.

A correction would be made in tomorrows paper. i said that was not good enough as there were more mistakes in the article.

He said what? I asked him what the high was for NOT.

( Long Pause). got tired of waiting for an answer and told him what it was. His reply .... OH ! and apologized again

I then strongly suggested that he do some research on NOT and write a whole new (CORRECT) article not just an apology for the paper tomorrow so that he may save some face, as it looks pretty bad on him.

He didnt commit to a new story but seemed to lean that way a little

He again apologized,

For what it is worth

Coop